The 1963 constitution provided for cabinet system of government whereas, 1979 constitution provided for a presidential system of government.
The 1963 constitution allowed the fusion of power between legislative and executive while the 1979 constitution provided for distinctive separation of powers among the Executive and legislative.
The 1963 constitution asserted for the official opposition whereas the 1979 constitution did not allow official opposition.
The 1963 constitution upheld supremacy of the parliament while the 1997 constitution upheld the view that constitution was supreme.
The 1963 constitution did not allow prime minister to appoint his members outside the parliament while 1979 constitution allowed the president to appoint ministers outside the parliament.
The 1963 constitution allowed for the appointment of prime ministers among the elected parliamentarian while the 1979 constitution provided for a separate election of the president by the electorate.
0 Comments
Comment