The rule of law presupposes that all men are equal before the law. But in practice, this is not always true. Discuss this

According to the rule of  law all men are
equal, but in practice this is not always the
cases for the reasons below:

  •  Sometimes, government officials are granted
    considerable discretionary powers to enable them carry out their duties effectively. These officials often mis-use
    these powers to the extent that the rule of law may be
  • Poverty, illiteracy and ignorance often work against the presupposition that ali men are equal before the
  •  Diplomatic immunity made it that ambassadors
    cannot be sued and prosecuted in the
    countries where they are serving rather they can be
    repatriated and this undermines the rule of law. 
  • Some government enact obnoxious laws that
    empower head of state to arrest and detain
    citizens without trial. This is a limitation
    to the rule of law. 
  • Parliamentary immunity, is enjoyed by members
    of the parliament. Members cannot be sued
    or prosecuted oh account of the statements they
    made on the floor of the house no
    matter how false they may be. This implies that they are not equal before the
    iaw with other citizens. 
  • Some citizens position like the Head of State,
    Ministers, Judges, Governors etc, make
    Dicey’s equality before the iaw a child’s
  • When judges lack moral integrity, no matter how independent the judiciary may be, equality before the law will
    be difficult. 
  • Customs and tradition: Sometimes the
    application of equality before the law is undermined in
    a bid not to violate the customs and
    tradition of the people. 
  • Economic Wealth: Sometimes justice is
    purchased in court of law as commodity and only the poor suffers, which
    is not in line with the rule of law.

Post a Comment